<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duke Maryland Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://turtledroppings.com/2009/02/duke-maryland-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://turtledroppings.com/2009/02/duke-maryland-part-2/</link>
	<description>Maryland Basketball and Football Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:20:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris B</title>
		<link>http://turtledroppings.com/2009/02/duke-maryland-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://turtledroppings.com/?p=410#comment-160</guid>
		<description>I could not agree more.  I still think the key is Maryland&#039;s ability to handle the Duke pressure.  Duke is still searching for an identity.  They changed to Scheyer at PG.  What does that say for Paulus and Smith?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more.  I still think the key is Maryland&#8217;s ability to handle the Duke pressure.  Duke is still searching for an identity.  They changed to Scheyer at PG.  What does that say for Paulus and Smith?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The ACC &#38; SEC Blog</title>
		<link>http://turtledroppings.com/2009/02/duke-maryland-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>The ACC &#38; SEC Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://turtledroppings.com/?p=410#comment-159</guid>
		<description>i think we are looking at two totally different teams than played in late Jan.  That Duke win on Sunday was good, but the Devils did not play very good defense.  They won that game by attacking on offense and getting to the free throw line a lot.  I say pack it in and make them out from the outside.  Don&#039;t give them cheapies at the line.  I think this one will be very close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think we are looking at two totally different teams than played in late Jan.  That Duke win on Sunday was good, but the Devils did not play very good defense.  They won that game by attacking on offense and getting to the free throw line a lot.  I say pack it in and make them out from the outside.  Don&#8217;t give them cheapies at the line.  I think this one will be very close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJH</title>
		<link>http://turtledroppings.com/2009/02/duke-maryland-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>JJH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://turtledroppings.com/?p=410#comment-158</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;m like most people.  I will expect the worst but hope for the best.  The season should would rocket upward if we are to win tonight but it won&#039;t be the end of our tournament hopes.  We need two more wins and probably a victory or two in the ACC tournament.  LETS GO TERPS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;m like most people.  I will expect the worst but hope for the best.  The season should would rocket upward if we are to win tonight but it won&#8217;t be the end of our tournament hopes.  We need two more wins and probably a victory or two in the ACC tournament.  LETS GO TERPS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

